Women Illustration
Overview of the personalised Resilience Assessment Report

See how we measure Resilience and the detailed insights into individual strengths and growth areas.

Download Report
To View the Resilience Assessment Report

See how we measure resiience.

    Resilience in the Age of Intelligence: Why Human Skills Will Define the Future of Work

    • The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025, surveying over 1,000 employers across 55 economies, ranks resilience, flexibility, and agility as the second most essential core skill today, right behind analytical thinking, with one of the largest projected increases in importance through 2030.
    • The same report projects 92 million jobs displaced by AI and automation by 2030, against 170 million newly created, a real, substantial transition, not a hypothetical one.
    • Being asked to train the AI system that may eventually replace you is already a documented, real phenomenon, not speculation, and how you respond to it says as much about resilience as anything else in this shift.

    Let’s not sugarcoat it: the AI shift isn’t coming, it’s here. It promises real gains in productivity, creativity, and scale, and it also brings disruption on a genuinely human level. Roles people once built careers around are dissolving. Some will feel survivor’s guilt, wondering why they stayed while others were displaced by code.

    The near-future workplace will increasingly run on intelligent systems. Many people will no longer be managed by humans at all, but by algorithms, some designed to be empathetic, others ruthlessly efficient. As large language models and autonomous agents absorb more of the cognitive load, the real question becomes: what actually stays uniquely human? The answer, backed now by real global data rather than just intuition, is resilience.

    Resilience Is Now a Documented Top Skill, Not Just an Intuition

    The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025, drawing on responses from more than 1,000 employers representing 14 million workers across 55 economies, ranks resilience, flexibility, and agility as the second most essential core skill in today’s workforce, immediately behind analytical thinking, and named essential by seven in ten companies surveyed. It’s also one of the fastest-rising skills projected through 2030, alongside AI and big data literacy and leadership and social influence. This isn’t a soft aspiration. It’s what a majority of the world’s largest employers are actively telling researchers they need.

    Resilience isn’t about grinding harder. It’s about bouncing better: the ability to navigate change, adversity, and uncertainty without losing clarity, composure, or compassion. In an AI-powered workplace, that becomes the difference between thriving and fracturing, not a nice-to-have layered on top of technical skill.

    The Scale of the Actual Shift

    The same WEF report projects 92 million jobs will be displaced by AI and broader labour-market shifts by 2030, against 170 million newly created, a net gain overall, but a genuinely large transition sitting underneath that headline number. Separately, a 2025 industry survey found 41% of employers plan AI-driven workforce reductions within five years, and nearly three in ten companies report having already replaced roles with AI, a figure some surveys expect to reach roughly 37% by the end of 2026. This isn’t speculative future-gazing. Amazon has stated directly, in an internal memo from its CEO, that AI efficiency gains will reduce its total corporate workforce. BT has announced plans to cut around 55,000 roles by the end of the decade, with roughly 10,000 of those specifically replaced by AI.

    One of the most underappreciated risks in working alongside intelligent systems is simple overwhelm. As AI accelerates the pace of decisions and output, ancient nervous system responses activate in familiar ways: avoidance, defensiveness, collapse. Polyvagal theory, developed by neuroscientist Stephen Porges, frames this through the lens of fight, flight, or freeze. The answer isn’t pushing harder. It’s learning to deliberately down-regulate. Tactical calm, the trained ability to restore equilibrium under real stress, becomes a genuine edge. Breathwork, micro-pauses, grounding rituals, even intentional silence, measurably rewire how the body responds to uncertainty. Calm becomes a choice, not a luxury reserved for calmer times.

    Structure Amid Chaos

    AI may run continuously. Humans can’t. Sleep, rhythm, and routine remain genuine foundations, not indulgences. Inadequate rest compromises emotional regulation, cognitive clarity, and immune function directly. Daily planning gives real structure inside genuine flux. Companies serious about keeping people performing well need to invest in these basics directly, not just ergonomic chairs and a wellness app, but cultural norms that actually protect recovery, rhythm, and sustainable performance over time.

    Micro-Habits: Bypassing Resistance to Change

    As AI reshapes workflows, constant adaptation becomes unavoidable, and change is genuinely hard; the brain resists it by default. Micro-habits, small, repeatable behaviours that bypass overwhelm and build real momentum, are worth emphasising directly. One breath before speaking. One hour with the phone off. One walk before a big decision. These small rituals compound into real change over time, and in a period of large-scale disruption, small, consistent wins matter more, not less.

    Emotional Intelligence: The Human Advantage

    What happens when a colleague is an AI agent? It won’t need encouragement. It won’t take offence. It also won’t feel guilt, compassion, or genuine curiosity. These emotional faculties, once filed under “soft skills,” are becoming real strategic advantages precisely because they’re the things AI genuinely can’t replicate. Impulse control, emotional literacy, practised positivity, these form the emotional backbone of resilient people. Gratitude, especially during disruption, anchors attention in the present. Presence, not raw productivity, may end up being the real performance edge in a workplace increasingly shaped by AI.

    Influence Without Authority: Redefining Leadership

    AI doesn’t eliminate leadership, it redefines it. The leaders positioned to thrive are the ones who can influence without relying purely on formal authority, drawing on insight, mastery, empathy, and a genuinely clear sense of purpose. AI can execute strategy. Only humans set vision, galvanise a team, and carry a sense of direction through real ambiguity. In this environment, resilience isn’t just self-management, it’s social capital. Emotional tone sets the room. Mindset shapes the team, whether that’s intended or not.

    The Quiet Grief of Displacement

    Worth naming directly: grief. As roles are automated, at the scale the WEF’s own 92-million-job projection describes, a real sense of loss, of identity, relevance, dignity, follows for a great many people. Those who remain may feel guilt. Others may feel envy. A few will look for someone to blame.

    Resilience doesn’t mean suppressing that grief. It means being with it, together, rather than alone. Organisations need real space for emotional honesty, not just performance dashboards. Leaders need to become genuine stewards of meaning, not just managers of output.

    Training Your Replacement: A Real, Documented Challenge

    There’s a quieter, deeply personal challenge already showing up, one that cuts straight to identity and purpose: being asked to train an AI system that may ultimately take over your own role. This isn’t hypothetical. From customer service scripts to advanced coding workflows, people are already feeding systems the exact knowledge that once made them genuinely indispensable, and many know precisely what they’re doing. Some comply out of duty. Others out of fear. A few out of genuine hope that aligning early with the shift keeps them relevant longer.

    Underneath all of that, for a great many people, there’s grief. And, understandably in some cases, quiet resistance.

    The Ethics of Exit and the Path of Stewardship

    The real organisational risk here isn’t only job loss, it’s disengagement: quiet sabotage, withheld insight, people who’ve stopped giving their genuine best because they feel disposable. So how do organisations genuinely invite people to help train the systems reshaping their own roles, without asking them to sacrifice their sense of self in the process?

    It starts with reframing, honestly. Seeing yourself as being replaced breeds real suffering. Seeing yourself as being repositioned opens room to grow. Training an AI system isn’t just offboarding, framed well, it’s genuine upskilling: prompt engineering, supervisory design, ethical feedback loops. These are real, emerging roles, and the people training today’s systems are often best positioned to lead tomorrow’s. There’s a genuine form of honour in contributing to a future you may not personally benefit from directly. That’s legacy. That’s leadership, not resignation.

    The CEO’s Real Dilemma

    Plenty of leaders find AI genuinely exciting not because they dislike people, but because people are hard: sick leave, interpersonal friction, burnout, misalignment. AI doesn’t complain. But people bring something AI structurally can’t: the spark, the story, the ability to hold real paradox. Strip out “the people problem” entirely, and an organisation risks erasing the very thing that makes it worth building in the first place. The organisations that keep people genuinely central, even as more tasks become automated, aren’t doing it out of sentiment. They’re doing it because that’s where the actual upside still lives.

    Resilience isn’t a consolation prize for staying human in an AI-shaped world. It’s the operating system underneath everything else. The workplace may increasingly run on algorithms, but meaning, trust, and creativity still live in breath, choice, and presence. Presence, not panic, is the real advantage now.

    Global Engagement Hit a New Low in 2026: What Gallup’s Data Means for Resilience

    • Global engagement was 23% in Gallup’s 2024 report. It’s now 20%, the lowest level since 2020, and the second straight year of decline, with no region worldwide bucking the trend.
    • The sharpest new finding: manager engagement specifically has collapsed from 31% in 2022 to 22% in 2025, wiping out what Gallup calls managers’ historical “engagement premium” over the people they lead.
    • Disengagement now costs the global economy an estimated $10 trillion a year, roughly 9% of global GDP, and best-practice organisations still achieve 79% manager engagement, nearly four times the global average, proof this is genuinely fixable, not inevitable.

    Gallup’s State of the Global Workplace report has become one of the most closely watched annual snapshots of how work is actually going for people, and the trend line across its last three editions tells a genuinely sobering story. In 2024, global engagement stood at 23%. The 2026 report, published in April 2026 and covering 2025 data, puts it at 20%, the lowest level Gallup has recorded since 2020, and the second consecutive year of decline. Every region measured saw engagement fall or stay flat. None improved.

    Resilience Institute offers a holistic approach to exactly the pattern this data describes, sustainable human performance and wellbeing, not a quick fix. This piece looks at what’s actually changed between the 2024 and 2026 reports, and what the sharpest new finding means for how resilience training should actually be applied.

    Then and Now: What Actually Changed

    The headline numbers moved in a consistent, worsening direction across every recent edition of the report. Global engagement: 23% (2024 report) → 21% (2025 report) → 20% (2026 report), a genuine, sustained decline rather than a single bad year. Daily stress has stayed stubbornly high across the same period, 41% in the 2024 and 2025 reports, 40% in the 2026 report, essentially flat and still well above pre-pandemic levels. One figure did move in the right direction: global wellbeing (Gallup’s “thriving” measure) rose slightly to 34% in the 2026 report, its first improvement in three years, though still meaning fewer than one in three people worldwide report genuinely thriving in their lives overall.

    The economic cost has grown alongside the decline. The 2026 report puts the cost of low engagement at roughly $10 trillion in lost productivity, around 9% of global GDP, a meaningfully larger figure than what earlier reports cited.

    The Real Story: Managers Are the Ones Disengaging Now

    Here’s what the 2024 report couldn’t yet show, and what makes the 2026 report genuinely different rather than just a worse version of the same story: manager engagement specifically has collapsed. It’s fallen from 31% in 2022 to 22% in 2025, a 9-point drop, with the steepest single-year fall, from 27% to 22%, landing between 2024 and 2025 alone. Individual contributor engagement, by contrast, has stayed relatively flat across the same period. Managers used to hold a real “engagement premium” over the people they led. Gallup’s own language is direct: that premium has essentially vanished, and managers are now barely more engaged than their own teams.

    This matters enormously given a separate, consistent Gallup finding: managers account for up to 70% of the variance in team-level engagement. When the people responsible for driving engagement are themselves disengaging fastest, the effect ripples downward directly. Gallup’s own framing for 2026 is blunt: the manager crisis is now the workforce crisis, not a side issue sitting next to it.

    There’s a genuinely hopeful data point buried in the same report worth holding onto: best-practice organisations still achieve 79% manager engagement, nearly four times the global average. This isn’t an inevitable, structural decline. It’s a solvable problem that most organisations simply haven’t solved yet.

    Beyond Surface-Level Solutions

    Plenty of organisations have addressed stress with surface-level fixes, wellness apps, generic stress management sessions, and these tend to fail at creating meaningful, lasting change. A more holistic approach, one incorporating emotional regulation, physical vitality, and mental clarity together, goes beyond basic wellness toward genuinely sustainable behavioural shift.

    Real resilience requires a systems-level view: the interplay between work, life, and individual capacity, not any one lever in isolation. That’s what makes an intervention resonate with what employees actually need, rather than another well-intentioned programme that doesn’t move the underlying numbers.

    Measuring What Engagement Surveys Miss

    Gallup’s engagement data reveals the scale of the problem clearly. What it doesn’t reveal is the individual mechanics underneath it. Resilience Institute’s Resilience Assessment offers a deeper, more granular view, measuring specific factors like emotional stability, focus, and vitality that often stay hidden inside a traditional engagement survey. This data-driven layer lets organisations target interventions precisely: highlighting, for instance, that a specific team is struggling with sustained energy rather than motivation broadly, information a standard engagement score alone won’t surface.

    Addressing Loneliness Directly

    Loneliness remains a genuine, persistent thread across every recent edition of Gallup’s report, particularly among remote and younger workers, and it’s directly linked to declining mental health, disengagement, and lower productivity. Human connection is a genuine cornerstone of resilience, and programmes built to strengthen social bonds within teams, guided reflection, small group discussion, structured check-ins, even in virtual settings, measurably help counter the isolation the data keeps flagging year after year.

    What This Means for Building Resilient Leadership

    Invest in Managers Specifically, Not Just Employees Broadly

    Given managers are now the fastest-disengaging group in the entire dataset, resilience investment aimed only at individual contributors misses the actual point of leverage. Managers need real support for their own resilience before they can genuinely model or sustain it for a team.

    Build Regular Feedback and Clear Expectations

    Practices like consistent feedback, clearly set expectations, and genuinely modelled emotional intelligence help managers create an environment that naturally reduces stress rather than compounding it.

    Prioritise Organisation-Level Change, Not Just Individual Coping

    Gallup’s own findings consistently favour organisation-level initiatives, changes in management practice, better resource allocation, over individual stress-management interventions alone. Resilient leaders create the conditions; individual coping skills matter more once those conditions are actually in place.

    Moving From Surviving to Thriving

    Gallup’s data consistently shows engaged employees are more likely to thrive across their whole life, not just at work, and building genuine resilience means helping people move past survival mode, where stress and overwhelm dominate, toward a state where they can find real meaning, purpose, and satisfaction in their role. A thriving workforce isn’t just more pleasant to manage. It’s measurably more productive, innovative, and adaptive, genuine advantages as organisations navigate a working environment that shows no sign of settling down.

    The data didn’t just get worse between 2024 and 2026. It got more specific. The manager crisis is the workforce crisis, and that’s exactly where resilience investment needs to go first.

    Positivity at Work: What Actually Builds a Resilient Culture

    • Nearly 3 in 4 employees report feeling more engaged and performing better when they feel genuinely heard, and companies where employees feel heard financially outperform their industry peers by a meaningful margin.
    • A popular claim that high-performing teams have exactly 6 positive interactions for every negative one doesn’t hold up. The underlying mathematical model was formally withdrawn by the journal that published it after a rigorous critique found the equations had no legitimate connection to emotional data.
    • The more modest, still-defensible version survives: teams and cultures with a healthier balance of positive to negative interaction do tend to perform better, there’s just no precise magic number behind it.

    Positivity at work is more than an individual’s mindset. It’s part of a larger system shaping how a workforce interacts, how people align with organisational goals, and how the culture as a whole either compounds or erodes over time. Leaders set values, expectations, and rules of engagement that flow down through an organisation; employees hold their own attitudes and perceptions that flow back up and shape culture in return. Building a genuinely positive workplace culture requires understanding both directions of that exchange, not just the one leadership controls.

    Why Culture Shows Up in the Numbers, Not Just the Vibe

    Do you feel listened to, supported, and included at work, or unheard and boxed in? That distinction matters for more than morale. A report on workplace mental health and wellbeing from the US Surgeon General found workplace culture has a substantial, measurable impact on employee wellbeing, productivity, and organisational performance. Toxic or negative cultures reliably show up in lost productivity and declining quality of work; positive cultures show up in stronger engagement and innovation. Culture has become a genuine input to the bottom line, not a soft adjacent concern.

    Employer priorities have shifted meaningfully in recent years, driven by a genuine rebalancing of what employees expect from work. Ernst & Young research found 54% of US workers had left a job specifically due to their manager’s lack of empathy toward workplace issues, and 49% left because of inadequate sensitivity to stress from their home life. The organisations that adapted fastest to this shift are now measurably ahead on culture-related metrics; the ones that didn’t are the ones still asking why retention feels harder than it used to.

    When Positivity Tips Into Something Toxic

    Genuine positivity means holding a constructive outlook while still engaging honestly with the good, the bad, and everything in between. Taken to an extreme, it curdles into something else. Tabitha Kirkland, a psychologist at the University of Washington, describes toxic positivity as an approach devoid of empathy that refuses to acknowledge genuine difficulty. It leaves people feeling invalidated and unheard, which is directly corrosive to the same engagement and performance positivity is supposed to build in the first place.

    A Workforce Institute survey found nearly three in four employees feel more engaged and perform better when they feel genuinely heard, and companies that financially outperform their industry peers show employees reporting feeling heard at a 26-percentage-point higher rate than their less successful counterparts. Taking positivity to a forced, unconditional extreme reliably backfires against the very outcomes it’s meant to produce.

    What Positive Leadership Actually Looks Like

    Positive leadership plays to people’s genuine strengths, gives real recognition, and maintains an authentically optimistic outlook, and it’s been consistently correlated with better engagement, optimism, and performance across the research.

    Play to strengths, not roundedness. Management thinker Peter Drucker argued individuals create more impact by deliberately sharpening the skills they already excel at rather than chasing a well-rounded profile. Leaders can apply this at the team level too: pairing a strong analyst with a strong presenter on a single project often produces something neither could deliver alone.

    Recognition compounds. Gallup’s research has found employees who don’t feel recognised at work are roughly twice as likely to leave. Recognition also does more than retain people individually; it signals clearly across a team what leadership actually values, which shapes behaviour well beyond the person being recognised. When feedback needs to address something that isn’t working, framing the conversation around what’s going well and how to build forward tends to land far better than leading with criticism.

    The ratio claim worth retiring. A once-popular claim held that high-performing teams show exactly six positive interactions for every negative one, while low-performing teams show one positive for every twenty negative. This traces back to research on team dynamics closely tied to the Fredrickson-Losada “critical positivity ratio,” a specific mathematical model that the journal American Psychologist formally, partially withdrew in 2013 after a rigorous critique found the underlying equations, borrowed from fluid dynamics, had no legitimate mathematical connection to emotional or team data. The researcher who built the model chose not to defend it. What survives is a softer, still-defensible point: teams with a healthier balance of constructive to critical interaction do tend to perform better. There’s just no precise number behind it, and it’s worth being skeptical of anyone citing one with false confidence.

    Optimism Spreads Through a Team, Literally

    The American Psychological Association defines optimism as the attitude that good things will happen and that one’s aims will ultimately be fulfilled. Optimistic leaders contribute something genuinely functional to a team beyond mood: they help generate solutions, build a credible vision forward, and reinforce the behaviours that move a team toward it.

    Wharton professor Sigal Barsade’s research on emotional contagion, the documented ripple effect through which emotions spread across individuals and groups, found positive emotional contagion specifically helps teams collaborate better, reduces conflict, and improves performance. When optimism becomes genuinely embedded in a team’s culture rather than performed, individuals within it tend to develop their own personal sense of optimism, which industry research from Leadership IQ, surveying over 11,000 employees, found may matter even more than manager-driven recognition alone: employees with a strong personal sense of optimism were more than twice as likely to report feeling inspired to do their best work.

    Resilience: The Skill Underneath the Culture

    The American Psychological Association defines resilience as the flexibility to adapt to change and challenge, and critically, it’s a trainable skill rather than a fixed trait. That same Leadership IQ research found resilience accounts for a meaningful share of an employee’s overall sense of inspiration at work, independent of recognition or optimism alone.

    Resilience Institute has tracked resilience levels across organisations globally for years, using a Resilience Diagnostic assessment built on 60 psychometric questions that measure the specific factors supporting or undermining resilience, producing what’s known as a Resilience Ratio for individuals and organisations alike.

    The Resilience Spiral

    This visual framework organises the 60 questions into 11 categories arranged as a spiral, giving each user a map of strengths, risks, and practical next steps. The upper half of the spiral, Spirit in Action, Train Mind, Engage Emotion, Energise Body, and Master Stress, represents the direction of genuine growth, connection, and flow. Spirit in Action, at the top, represents peak performance. Master Stress sits at the base, the pivot point: left unmanaged, stress is what determines whether someone moves up the spiral or down it.

    The lower half, Confused, Disengaged, Withdrawn, Vulnerable, Distressed, and Depressed, represents the progression when resilience isn’t sustained. Confusion produces a loss of focus; disengagement leads to boredom and falling productivity; withdrawal costs energy and presence; vulnerability shows up as fatigue and indifference; distress drives attrition and a deteriorating culture. Individuals and organisations operating from the upper half consistently function at a higher level than those sliding into the lower one.

    Training It, Not Just Measuring It

    Resilience Institute’s own training data, spanning the Resilience app, webinars, workshops, and communications support, has found structured resilience training measurably increases performance, reduces risk, and boosts growth in capability. The app itself provides ongoing access to resilience content, goal tracking, meditations, video training from Dr Sven Hansen, and a support chatbot, alongside the diagnostic that anchors the whole system. Thousands of organisations globally use this combination to measure and actively build both individual and organisational resilience, and the same balance-of-interaction principle discussed above, genuine, not forced, positivity, is exactly what the training is designed to build.

    Positive culture isn’t a mood you generate once and coast on. It’s a ratio you keep genuinely honest, with no magic number required, just the discipline to keep it real.

    Workplace Trends 2025: How Resilience Drives Hybrid Work, AI, and Employee Well-Being

    • 88% of US employers now offer some form of hybrid work, and 80% of employees report actively using AI in their work, up from 72% the year before.
    • Resilience, flexibility, and agility now rank as the second most essential workplace skill globally, immediately behind analytical thinking, according to the World Economic Forum.
    • None of these trends, hybrid work, AI adoption, skills-based hiring, purpose-driven culture, work in isolation. Resilience is what lets an organisation actually absorb all of them at once.

    The workplace keeps evolving, and the pace hasn’t slowed. Hybrid work has moved from temporary accommodation to permanent structure, AI is reshaping how tasks actually get done, and employee wellbeing has become a genuine strategic priority rather than an HR afterthought. These shifts bring real challenges, but they also create real opportunity for organisations that take resilience seriously.

    Hybrid Work Is Now the Standard, Not the Exception

    The trend: Hybrid work is no longer a temporary solution. Current Robert Half data shows 88% of US employers now offer some form of hybrid arrangement, and organisations are actively balancing genuine flexibility against the real challenge of maintaining collaboration, culture, and productivity across dispersed teams.

    How resilience helps: Resilience practices bridge the gaps distance creates. Mindfulness, emotional agility, and genuinely clear communication keep team members connected and engaged regardless of location, and training on energy management and stress reduction supports productivity directly. Resilience training helps remote workers build real boundaries between work and personal life, reducing burnout risk, while leaders with strong emotional agility foster collaboration even across a dispersed team, modelling exactly the behaviour they want reflected back.

    Employee Wellbeing as a Genuine Retention Strategy

    The trend: Organisations are placing mental health and holistic wellbeing at the centre of workplace strategy, building genuine psychological safety, actively preventing burnout, and supporting real work-life integration rather than treating wellbeing as a peripheral benefit.

    How resilience helps: Resilience Institute’s assessments and training programmes build physical, mental, and emotional wellbeing directly, fostering a culture where individuals genuinely thrive and teams perform at their best. Gallup’s research independently supports this direction: employees who frequently experience burnout are 63% more likely to take a sick day and 2.6 times more likely to be actively job-hunting, real, measurable costs that a serious wellbeing strategy directly addresses.

    AI in the Workplace: Resilience as the Human Complement

    The trend: AI adoption at work has grown fast and genuinely. A 2025 State of Hybrid Work report found 80% of employees now use AI in their work, up from 72% the year before, with more than a quarter using it daily. While AI handles repetitive tasks with real efficiency, human-centric skills, creativity, adaptability, emotional intelligence, remain more valuable than ever, and most current analysis suggests AI is augmenting roles more than replacing them outright, at least for now.

    How resilience helps: Resilience training builds the adaptability and problem-solving capacity people need to thrive alongside AI rather than feel threatened by it. Resilient employees tend to view AI as a genuine tool for enhancing their own role rather than a competitor, which measurably reduces anxiety and supports real innovation instead of quiet resistance.

    Skills Over Credentials: The Case for Learning Agility

    The trend: Employers increasingly prioritise demonstrated skills and outcomes over traditional credentials. In a world of project-based work and dynamic teams, genuine adaptability and continuous learning matter more than a fixed qualification earned years earlier. The World Economic Forum’s Future of Jobs Report 2025, surveying over 1,000 employers across 55 economies, ranks resilience, flexibility, and agility as the second most essential core skill in today’s workforce, immediately behind analytical thinking.

    How resilience helps: Resilience builds genuine learning agility, encouraging people to embrace change and proactively acquire new skills rather than waiting to be told what’s needed. A resilient mindset reframes an unfamiliar challenge as a real growth opportunity rather than a threat, exactly the disposition a skills-based economy rewards.

    Purpose-Driven Workplaces: Values as a Retention Lever

    The trend: Employees, particularly younger generations entering the workforce, are increasingly drawn to organisations that genuinely align with their own values and sense of purpose. Companies emphasising sustainability, integrity, and real social impact are better positioned to attract and retain strong talent as a result.

    How resilience helps: Resilience training integrates purpose-driven leadership and genuine values alignment directly into how a workplace actually functions. Employees who feel authentically connected to their organisation’s mission stay more engaged and motivated, particularly during genuinely difficult stretches when that connection matters most.

    Thriving Through All of It at Once

    The future of work holds real possibility, but it demands genuine preparation and adaptability. None of the trends above, hybrid work, AI adoption, skills-based hiring, purpose-driven culture, resolve in isolation; most organisations are navigating all of them simultaneously. Resilience is what makes that simultaneous navigation genuinely possible, through mindfulness, emotional agility, and deliberate stress management applied consistently rather than reached for only in a crisis.

    Every workplace trend eventually asks the same underlying question: can your people actually absorb this much change at once? Resilience is the honest answer to that question, not a specific tactic for any single trend.

    Ready to build resilience strategies for your organisation? Discover how the Resilience Assessment can provide real insight into your team’s strengths and genuine growth areas.

    A Guide to Positivity at Work

    What is positivity?

    Positivity at work is more than a personal mindset or attitude. It is part of a bigger movement that influences the individual worker, how the workforce interacts with one another, and how workers align with the organisational goals and culture at large.

    Positive workplace cultures ensure beneficial change that ripples from leaders all the way down to individual employees and vice versa. These types of cultures build empathy, optimism, and resilience —  all keys to success. Building a positive workplace culture demands an understanding of the dynamics of the workplace from the top and bottom and the people within it.

    From the top, leaders create values, experiences, and rules of engagement that trickle down the organisation to the employees. Employees also hold their own attitudes, beliefs, and perceptions that provide feedback to leadership and influence the overall workplace culture.

    Positive vs negative workplace cultures

    Do you feel listened to, supported, and included at work? Or do you feel unheard, neglected, and boxed in? The quality of the culture in the workplace plays a significant role not only in overall wellness but also in performance.

    In broad terms, workplace cultures fall somewhere between positive and negative. A 2022 report on Workplace Mental Health and Well-Being by the United States Surgeon General reveals that workplace culture has a significant impact on employee well-being, productivity, and organisational performance.

    Negative or toxic workplaces can result in a loss of worker productivity, performance, and overall quality of work. On the other side of the coin, a positive work culture can boost engagement and innovation.

    Put simply, work is no longer just work. The cultures that form in the workplace have just as much to say about a company’s bottom line as the numbers.

    Modern workplace culture

    Today, the workplace is more than a space where people gather — either in person, online, or both — to perform their jobs. During the pandemic and the return to the office, I spent time reporting on the work-life. Amid the many interviews of academic experts, industry leaders, and workers, a pattern emerged.

    The rapidly changing landscape, from hybrid work to the Great Resignation, caused employers to shift their views on workplace culture radically. While employers strived to meet goals, employees sought a more balanced work-home life.

    For example, 2022 research by Ernst & Young found that 54% of workers in the United States left a job due to their boss’ lack of empathy when it came to issues at work. The research also found that 49% of workers left their job because of inadequate sensitivity to home life stress.

    While some innovative leaders were onto this approach long before, the idea that the workplace should equally focus on employee expectations came to the forefront. The results have created a more dynamic workplace culture predicated on creating positive workplace cultures and mitigating negative influences.

    Toxic positivity

    Taken at face value, positivity is simply maintaining a positive perspective on life — the good, the bad, the ugly, and the beautiful. At its extreme, positivity can seem out of touch with reality. Simply putting on the don’t worry, be happy blinders can neglect the challenges and uncertainties that people face in everyday life.

    Tabitha Kirkland, a psychologist and associate teaching professor at the University of Washington’s Department of Psychology, says that toxic positivity is devoid of empathy and neglects to recognize the negative things in life. This approach can make people feel invalidated and not listened to, which is critical to employee engagement, performance, and the financial success of the company.

    A 2021 survey by the Workforce Institute found that nearly 3 out of 4 employees say that they feel more engaged and perform better at work when they feel heard. This also impacts the overall financial performance of the company, as the survey also found that employees in companies that financially outperform others in their industry feel heard more by a margin of 26%.

    Taking an extreme approach to positivity can actually backfire.

    Positive leadership and optimism

    Positivity starts with a form of leadership approach that plays to people’s skills, gives recognition and encouragement to others, and maintains an optimistic outlook. Positive leadership has been correlated with better employee engagement, optimism, and performance.

    Sticking to strengths

    Renowned Austrian-American management consultant Peter Drucker believed that individuals could create more impact at work by focusing on developing the skills they excel at. Instead of spending time trying to make a well-rounded skill set, Drucker believed that sharpening the tip of the spear and strategically cultivating one’s strengths and learning styles would serve an individual the best.

    Leaders and managers can take a page from Drucker’s book by identifying team members’ skills and enabling them to work within that range. This does not have to be an entirely individual pursuit.

    For example, if a project requires data analysis, but must ultimately be presented at a higher level meeting, assemble a team of analysts and designers to work together to find the trends and then present them in a digestible form. The push and pull dynamics can create something more powerful than numbers or graphics would alone.

    Recognition and encouragement

    Encouragement and recognition are two key spices in the recipe of healthy conversations. Gallup notes that simply recognizing employees not only positively impact engagement and productivity, it also can help keep employees around for longer. The study found that employees who do not feel recognized at work are twice as likely to quit.

    Beyond the individual, recognition also impacts teams by painting a transparent picture of what leadership thinks success should look like. But sometimes conversations have to steer towards more difficult subjects, like when things need improvement.

    When it comes to difficult conversations, delivering feedback requires a delicate approach. Instead of using harsh criticism, reframing the conversation to focus on what went well and how to pursue future success can go a long way in making a positive impact on the team.

    Research on team conversations indicates that high-performing teams have 6 positive interactions for every negative one, while low-performing teams only have 1 positive interaction for every 20 negative ones. While these numbers may seem extreme, there is a potential explanation for why positive interactions dominate better-performing teams.

    Optimism and emotional contagion

    If positivity is part of the larger cultural framework of an organisation, then optimism certainly plays a role. The American Psychological Association defines optimism as “hopefulness: the attitude that good things will happen and that people’s wishes or aims will ultimately be fulfilled.”

    Optimistic leaders provide a necessary positive emotional contribution to the team. They find solutions to problems, help create a vision for the future, and inspire others to reach that goal by reinforcing the positives. Sound familiar? A leader who practices recognition and encouragement is already building an optimistic culture.

    This optimism can positively impact teams through emotional contagion. Coined by Sigal Barsade, Professor of Management at Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, emotional contagion is the ripple effect that occurs as emotions spread among individuals and groups. Barsade’s innovative research found that positive emotional contagion helped people work together, limited conflict, and boosted performance.

    So when optimism becomes the attitude and outlook in the workplace, positive emotions can flow. This is critical because if the team is optimistic, then individuals can begin to harbour a personal sense of optimism — which may be even more valuable.

    A 2022 study by Leadership IQ of over 11,000 employees found that while managers that give recognition have a positive impact, employees with a personal sense of optimism are more engaged. In fact, employees higher in self-optimism are more than twice as likely to feel inspired to try their best at work.

    The ripple effect of optimism starts at the top but has the potential to create the biggest impact on employees when it is felt at a personal level. The Leadership IQ study also identified another major component of an employee’s inspiration and engagement at work: resilience.

    Resilience training, tools, and techniques

    Resilience is the use of flexibility to adapt to change and challenges, says the American Psychological Association. Even more critical, resilience skills can be trained. This is important because resilience not only factors into worker engagement, but it can also account for 25% of an employee’s inspiration at work.

    Measuring Resilience

    The Resilience Institute conducted a global study on resilience levels that spanned from 2018-2021. When the pandemic hit, resilience levels dropped globally. However, people began to bounce back as they adapted to the rapidly changing world. This bounce factor enables people to adapt in the face of change and challenges.

    During the pandemic, people have bounced back by learning to connect in new ways during lockdowns, learning to cope with their mental health, and learning how to get better sleep. In fact, the Resilience Insitute’s 2022 Global Report found that sleep is the most important factor for developing resilience.

    We measure resilience through the Resilience Diagnostics assessment. Using key psychometrics, the Resilience Diagnostic assessment uses 60 questions that measure specific factors that support or undermine resilience. Individuals and the entire organisation can use the tool via the web or mobile app to view the factors that promote your resilience or hinder it. This is known as the Resilience Ratio.

    The Resilience Spiral

    This visual tool represents the 11 main categories that make up different parts of the 60 questions in the Resilience Diagnostics assessment. Completing the questionnaire provides the user with a map of strengths and risks and practical recommendations to move up the spiral.

    The top half of the Resilience Spiral includes the following categories:

    • Spirit in Action
    • Train Mind
    • Engage Emotion
    • Energise Body
    • Master Stress

    The upper half helps develop resilience and enables growth, connection, and flow. At the top of the spiral sits Spirit in Action, which represents peak performance. Next sits Train Mind, which relies on the fact that training the brain can combat the effects of ageing and performance.

    Engage Emotion uses awareness to harshness the passion and creativity of emotions. The mind and body are intimately connected — energising the body sets the tone for the rest of the spiral. At the base sits Master Stress. Stress is the teetering point between the top and the bottom of the spiral because stress can rule your world when left unmanaged.

    On the other side of the coin, the lower half of the Resilience Spiral includes the categories:

    • Confused
    • Disengaged
    • Withdrawn
    • Vulnerable
    • Distressed
    • Depressed

    The lower half represents a lack of resilience. The first step down the spiral is Confused, which leads to a lack of focus. Next is Disengaged, which creates boredom and, eventually, loss of productivity. Progression down the spiral leads to Withdrawn — where the body loses energy and engagement.

    Fatigue kicks in at the Vulnerable, as people feel indifferent. Distressed can lead to loss of staff and unhealthy organisational culture. Finally, Depressed signals the end of an organisation.

    Resilient people and organisations work at higher levels. When resilience fails, people and organisations drop into the lower levels.

    Training Resilience

    The Resilience Institute offers resilience training — ranging from the Resilience app to webinars, workshops, and comms support — that can increase performance by 41%, decrease risk by 34%, and boost growth in capability by 38%.

    Gain access to a library of information to help you learn more about the resilience factors and your own Resilience ratio, and learn skills for how to bounce back, access flow states,  and increase emotional intelligence. The app also includes goal tracking, over 50 resilience training videos by Dr Sven Hansen, daily meditations, and a support chatbot.

    The app is available in English, French, Spanish, Dutch, German and Mandarin. Thousands of organisations use The Resilience Institute to measure and improve individual and organisational resilience. Are you ready for resilience?

    Original Source: https://resiliencei.com/blog/positivity-at-work/

    The Resilience Institute

    Resilience training, leadership development and assessment for organisations across Asia.

    435 Orchard Road, Level 11, Wisma Atria
    Singapore 238877

    [email protected]
    +65 9489 9547