Women Illustration
Overview of the personalised Resilience Assessment Report

See how we measure Resilience and the detailed insights into individual strengths and growth areas.

Download Report
To View the Resilience Assessment Report

See how we measure resiience.

    Sleep: The Brain’s Nightly Cleaning Cycle

    • A January 2025 study identified the specific mechanism behind the brain’s overnight waste-clearance system, and late 2024 research confirmed, for the first time, that this same system operates in humans, not just lab animals.
    • This clearance process, nicknamed the brain’s “dishwasher cycle,” runs almost exclusively during deep sleep and is thought to remove metabolic waste linked to neurodegenerative disease when it fails to run properly.
    • Sleep isn’t passive downtime. It’s an active, biologically necessary maintenance cycle, and skipping it accumulates a cost that goes well beyond feeling tired the next day.

    For decades, the honest scientific answer to “why do we sleep?” was surprisingly thin. Restoration, memory consolidation, energy conservation, all genuine partial answers, none fully satisfying. A wave of research over the past two years has added something far more concrete: a specific, physical cleaning process that runs almost exclusively while you’re asleep, and that researchers only confirmed operates in humans within the last year.

    The Brain’s Nightly Dishwasher Cycle

    In 2012, neuroscientist Maiken Nedergaard and her team at the University of Rochester discovered what they named the glymphatic system, a network of fluid-filled channels running alongside the brain’s blood vessels that flushes out metabolic waste, including proteins linked to neurodegenerative disease, using cerebrospinal fluid as the cleaning agent. Unlike the body’s lymphatic system, the brain has no traditional lymph nodes, so it relies on this separate, glial-cell-supported pathway instead.

    The critical detail: this system is dramatically more active during sleep than during wakefulness. A January 2025 study published in Cell identified the specific driver, synchronized waves of the neurotransmitter norepinephrine triggering rhythmic contractions in blood vessels, that pump cerebrospinal fluid through brain tissue during deep, non-REM sleep specifically. Nedergaard’s own description of the process has become genuinely famous in sleep science circles: “It’s like turning on the dishwasher before you go to bed and waking up with a clean brain.”

    Until recently, every finding on this system came from studies in mice. That changed in late 2024, when researchers imaging the brains of patients undergoing surgery confirmed, for the first time directly in humans, that this same clearance pathway runs alongside blood vessels exactly as the animal research predicted. It’s a rare thing in neuroscience: a mechanism proposed over a decade ago, finally confirmed in the species it was always meant to explain.

    Why This Matters Beyond Feeling Rested

    The stakes here go well past next-day grogginess. Researchers increasingly view impaired glymphatic clearance as a plausible contributing factor in neurodegenerative conditions, since the waste products this system is designed to remove include proteins implicated in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. When sleep is chronically disrupted, this maintenance cycle doesn’t get to run properly, night after night, and the researchers studying this describe a genuinely bidirectional problem: poor sleep may allow harmful waste to accumulate, and that accumulation may, in turn, make good sleep harder to achieve, a pattern that can compound quietly over years before symptoms become obvious.

    Notably, one widely used sleep medication, zolpidem, was found in the same research to actually suppress the norepinephrine oscillations that drive this clearance process, even while helping someone fall asleep faster. This is a genuinely important nuance: sleep quantity and sleep quality aren’t automatically the same thing, and how a person gets to sleep may affect whether the brain’s cleaning cycle can actually do its job once they’re there.

    What Actually Supports This Process

    Since this clearance process depends specifically on deep, non-REM sleep, the practical guidance lines up closely with standard sleep hygiene advice, now with a clearer biological reason behind it.

    1

    Protect Total Sleep Time

    Deep sleep is concentrated in the earlier part of the night and shrinks disproportionately when total sleep time gets cut short. Consistently sleeping 7 to 9 hours protects the specific sleep stage this clearance process depends on, not just total rest.

    2

    Keep a Consistent Schedule

    Irregular sleep timing disrupts the deeper sleep stages more than total hours alone suggest. A steady sleep and wake time, even on weekends, supports the consistent architecture this process needs to run properly night after night.

    3

    Be Thoughtful About Sleep Aids

    Falling asleep quickly isn’t the only thing that matters. Some common sleep medications have been found to suppress the specific neurological activity this clearance process depends on, even while helping someone fall asleep faster. This is worth raising directly with a doctor rather than assuming all paths to “more sleep” are equivalent.

    4

    Limit Alcohol Before Bed

    Alcohol measurably reduces the proportion of deep, restorative sleep across the night, even when it helps someone fall asleep faster initially. A drink that seems to help you doze off can quietly work against the very sleep stage that matters most for this process.

    Sleep isn’t the brain switching off. It’s the one time each day the brain runs its own cleaning cycle, and that cycle only just got confirmed to actually run in humans the way scientists always suspected.

    10 Steps to Mental Health First Aid

    • Over 1 billion people worldwide currently live with a mental health condition, roughly 1 in 8 people, and depression and anxiety alone cost the global economy an estimated $1 trillion annually in lost productivity.
    • Workplace mental health initiatives return an estimated $4 to $10 for every $1 invested, a genuinely rare case where doing the compassionate thing and the economically sound thing point in exactly the same direction.
    • Fear, sadness, and anger are not malfunctions, they’re ancient signals with a specific message each. Recovery is the normal outcome, and treatment, personalised to the individual, is genuinely effective.

    We’re increasingly awake to the real scale and cost of mental illness. Current WHO data puts the number of people worldwide living with a mental health condition at over 1 billion, roughly 1 in 8 people, and depression and anxiety alone cost the global economy an estimated $1 trillion a year in lost productivity. On the other side of the ledger: workplace mental health initiatives return an estimated $4 to $10 for every dollar invested. Whether you’re personally affected, supporting a family member, or a colleague trying to help, these ten steps offer a practical way through.

    1. Understand Where Mental Illness Comes From

    Genes, early environment, adverse events, and personal behaviour all contribute in genuinely complex, interacting ways, and there’s still a great deal researchers are working out. Neuroscientist Robert Sapolsky’s research suggests a positive, nurturing early environment can be protective even for people carrying recognised genetic risk patterns. Learning to handle adversity early in life helps, and building genuine resilience skills is protective, both in prevention and in recovery. Feeling anxious or sad after a tragic or traumatic event is entirely normal, and in most cases, recovery begins within about two weeks. More extreme or repeated events can produce longer-term consequences, including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress.

    Difficult childhood experiences, heavy social media use, disrupted sleep, and rising environmental temperature have all been implicated as contributing factors. Climate journalist David Wallace-Wells’ research has documented how heat, extreme weather, and conflict measurably increase rates of violence, anxiety, depression, and PTSD. Anxious parenting styles, heightened sensitivity, reduced physical activity, limited time outdoors, and social isolation are all correlated with poorer mental health outcomes as well.

    2. Recognise Distress as Normal Under Real Adversity

    Every organism needs a reliable way to distinguish safety from danger; it’s much of why life has been so evolutionarily successful. Under overwhelming threat, withdrawing, collapsing, or crying is the Freeze reaction, tied to sadness. In direct conflict, shouting or physically defending yourself is the Fight reaction, driven by anger. When escape is possible, the Flight reaction, driven by fear, takes over. All three can genuinely save your life in an acute, serious event. Repeated or prolonged, through war, recurring disaster, or chronic conflict, they can leave lasting PTSD instead.

    Modern, fast-paced digital life assails most people with small, continuous, low-grade threats, while shrinking the time available to recover, sleep, and reconnect with the people who matter. Sustained sadness from feeling worn down, dominated, or isolated can deepen into depression. Sustained fear under ongoing risk can deepen into anxiety. Repeated frustration against difficulty can deepen into hostility.

    While the freeze, fight, and flight reactions themselves are brief and forceful, the underlying feelings, sadness, fear, anger, can linger well beyond the triggering moment. Sadness is a signal to seek safety and reconnect with love and joy. Fear is a signal to move toward calm and safety. Anger is a signal to address and disable a genuine threat. These are normal, protective emotions, not malfunctions. Learning to notice them and respond skilfully to what they’re actually signalling is the skill. When these states become disconnected from the actual situation and start genuinely impairing normal function, that’s the point to consider clinical depression, an anxiety disorder, or a hostility-related condition, and seek appropriate support.

    3. Know That Recovery Is Normal and Treatment Works

    Recovery, given time and appropriate support, is the normal outcome, even for more serious conditions like schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, where thoughtful life management combined with treatment is genuinely effective. For depression, anxiety, and hostility specifically, firm and caring support, lifestyle improvement, counselling, meditation, positive practice, and structured thinking skills can all be genuinely curative on their own or alongside medication. Treatment works best when it’s personalised to the individual and their specific situation, in consultation with a qualified professional, rather than defaulting automatically to any single approach without that conversation. For many people with moderate to severe conditions, medication combined with therapy remains standard, evidence-based care, not a fallback to be avoided.

    4. Recognise, Understand, and Counter Anxiety

    Anxiety shows up through body, emotion, and mind together. The body prepares to run: heart rate rises, blood shifts from skin and gut toward the legs, breathing quickens, adrenaline surges, and cortisol eventually rises too. That physical state is felt as fear, nervousness, dread, or in its most intense form, terror. The mind gets caught looping on future consequences.

    Understanding this mechanism opens real options: moving the body, relaxing the muscles, slowing the breath, and seeking safe, reassuring surroundings, gentle music, nature, physical touch, and sleep, all genuinely help. Watching for the earliest signs of fear and deliberately calling to mind a calm, safe image counters it directly. Writing worries down and actively challenging them, rather than letting them loop unexamined, helps too. With practice, attention can be redirected back to the present moment increasingly quickly.

    5. Recognise, Understand, and Counter Depression

    In depression, the body wants to withdraw and be supported: posture slumps, the head and eyes drop, fatigue deepens, and disrupted sleep, including early waking, often follows, alongside rising cortisol. Emotionally, this shows up as disappointment, sadness, isolation, and hopelessness. The thinking pattern tends toward personalising blame, “everything bad always happens to me”, and ruminating on the past rather than the present, with optimism fading as the pattern continues.

    Understanding the pattern opens a path out: sitting up, looking up, and actively seeking comfort from others. Exercise, fresh air, time in nature, and genuine sleep all help. Acknowledging the sadness honestly, rather than denying it, while also deliberately directing attention toward appreciation, small pleasures, and moments of genuine joy, counters the pull toward rumination. Remembering that you’re not alone, actively nurturing hope, and staying anchored in the present moment all support recovery.

    Five More Practical Steps

    6

    Learn the Practical Steps of Rapid Bounce

    Mastering the ability to bounce back is central to resilience, both sustaining an already good life and genuinely growing from adversity (post-traumatic growth). Learning to recognise how resilience fails at each stage, and practising specific, concrete actions to reverse a downward spiral early, is a trainable skill worth building deliberately rather than only reaching for during a crisis.

    7

    Take Care of Your Body

    Physical wellbeing is ground zero. Thoughts and emotions evolved to help the body manage adversity and move toward a genuinely good life, which is exactly why physical care is core to prevention, resilience, and recovery, and has real evidence behind it as a treatment for mental illness, not just a lifestyle nicety. Secure adequate sleep at consistent times. Move your body daily. Eat well, less sugar, more vegetables, closer to a Mediterranean pattern. Get outside into nature and sunlight most days. Stretch each morning. Slow your breathing and genuinely relax for at least eight minutes a day.

    8

    Cultivate Positive Emotion

    Positive emotions activate vagal tone, support better health, and improve clarity of thought. Deliberately generating happiness counters depression. Calm, deliberate relaxation counters anxiety. Kindness and compassion counter hostility. Gratitude, contentment, passion, joy, serenity, and enthusiasm all work the same way. Every time you deliberately make space for a genuine positive feeling, you’re building real mental fitness, not just enjoying a nice moment.

    9

    Notice and Direct Your Thoughts

    Cognitive behavioural therapy has been shown to be as effective as medication for depression in many cases, and applies broadly across different kinds of adversity. The core method is simple: pay attention to your thoughts and write them down, challenge whether they’re actually accurate, then reframe them in more constructive terms. In depression, the thought “everything bad always happens to me” might be countered with, “Not everything. Yesterday was genuinely fine. Other people face real challenges too.” In fear, “how will I ever meet this deadline” might become, “If I don’t, we’ll manage. Focusing on what’s actually needed right now gets me closer than worrying does.”

    10

    Be Kind and Considerate to Others

    Genuine, thoughtful kindness toward others tends to help the person giving it as much as, or more than, the person receiving it. Start with yourself. Many people are quietly self-critical and hard on themselves by default; being genuinely gentle with yourself, remembering your own good qualities, and taking real time to enjoy and celebrate is the foundation everything else builds on. A simple practice: sit quietly, breathe slowly, draw kindness inward on the inhale, and let goodness radiate outward on the exhale. From there, channel that same energy outward, supporting a cause, helping someone in real need, or choosing work that genuinely benefits others.

    Fear, sadness, and anger aren’t malfunctions. They’re ancient signals asking for a specific response. Recovery is the normal outcome, and the right support, personalised and often professional, genuinely works.

    A History of Resilience: One Founder’s Perspective

    • Resilience, as a business and health concept, went from a peripheral, almost fringe idea in the early 1990s to a mainstream field now attracting billions in investment.
    • The field’s biggest ongoing challenge isn’t a lack of evidence, it’s fragmentation: dozens of overlapping terms, disciplines, and providers competing to define what “resilience” actually means and how to measure it well.
    • Organisations invest in resilience for three distinct reasons, genuine care, economic return, or fear of risk, and the strongest solutions address all three at once rather than picking one.

    This is a personal history, told from the perspective of Resilience Institute’s founder, reflecting on decades spent building a field that didn’t really exist as a business category when it started. It’s a reflection written from a particular point in time, its predictions about the future of resilience are exactly that, predictions, worth reading as one experienced practitioner’s view rather than settled fact.

    With a professor-of-paediatrics father, a psychiatric-social-worker mother, two competitive brothers, a background in special forces, triathlon, ocean swimming, surfski racing, medicine, and an MBA, building a resilience business seemed like it should have been straightforward. It hasn’t been. It’s been long, complex, and genuinely difficult, even while helping tens of thousands of people and many organisations along the way. Scaling what should, on paper, be a very good business has been maddeningly slow.

    In the early days, family and medical colleagues were openly sceptical. Executives found the whole idea strange. Why build resilience deliberately, the thinking went, when it’s genetic? Why would an organisation involve itself in the personal territory of an employee’s health, suffering, emotions, and thoughts? Why prevent disease at all when treating it is so much more lucrative?

    Today, “resilience,” alongside a long list of overlapping synonyms, sits at the centre of parenting, education, business, NGOs, government, infrastructure, ecosystems, and sport. Billions are being invested in new ventures. It’s become something of a celebrity feeding frenzy, genuine experts working alongside gurus, placebos, and outright scams. This reflection covers the big challenges, the foundations that actually matter, the science and evidence, real mistakes made along the way, and where the field might be heading.

    Discovering Resilience

    “Resilience” first entered my consciousness in 1994, through Daryl Conner’s Managing at the Speed of Change, which introduced the concept’s role in leading organisational change. The underlying idea wasn’t new. My parents had spent their careers using medicine to shape better lives. Sport taught me the discipline required for genuine expertise. Special forces training revealed the real depth of human will. Sports medicine gave the whole thing a modern scientific frame. My own angle on it was simple: could business and organisations be used to build the capacities of excellence across more communities, not just individuals who could already afford it?

    At the time, health insurers had already studied the impact of simple physical wellbeing programmes. A good programme combined leadership engagement, health risk assessment, and relevant lifestyle education, and the early studies were consistent: health risk factors dropped, sickness events and costs fell, absenteeism and turnover declined, and morale and productivity improved. Health status improved, sickness-care costs fell, and organisations saw a genuine positive return, studies of the era suggested a net present value of $2 to $3 for every $1 invested, in a US market carrying roughly double the health costs of most developed economies. In publicly funded health systems, the financial incentive for organisations to manage health risk directly was far weaker.

    In 1989, we were building simple health risk assessments and basic workshops on exercise, nutrition, and health risk management. By 1992, I’d built the first version of a health check designed to be completed electronically. Early adopters existed, but they were almost entirely senior executives and professionals.

    A client asking for “stress management” to be added to an executive health programme led me to Merv Dickinson, who held a PhD in leadership psychology. Together we designed interventions to build self-awareness and self-mastery, and that partnership became the foundation of our work in executive leadership development. Merv mentored me directly into the territory of emotion, mind, and spirit, and how to actually facilitate leadership teams through it. Our first resilience programmes launched from there, and genuinely progressive businesses started paying attention.

    After an MBA and five years running an executive health clinic, Resilience Institute finally launched. The intent was clear: engage leaders directly, run genuinely rigorous health assessments, and deliver evidence-based, motivational workshops that actually changed behaviour. It worked. Physical, emotional, and mental measures moved in the right direction, and the engagements themselves carried real, visible energy.

    Through most of the 2000s, competition was minimal, the market was tiny, and the whole concept sat at the periphery of business thinking. Building a viable business in that environment was genuinely tough, but it was a productive stretch. We ran health checks on thousands of people, delivered hundreds of workshops, and brought the concept into Australia, learning along the way how to collect and present health and resilience data properly, while respecting privacy and security.

    As emotional intelligence, neurobiology, and the resilience concept itself matured, training with Daniel Goleman and later Andrew Shatte sharpened how we assessed and coached the emotional and cognitive dimensions of resilience directly. Small teams formed across Australia, Europe, Singapore, and the UK, and our reputation grew steadily through organisations like PwC, GE, AXA, and several major banks, each pushing our thinking further.

    By 2014, digitising further was clearly necessary. Training was moving online, and the app economy was expanding fast. We ran psychometrics and analytics across our assessments, experimented with new platforms, converted our workshop content into short micro-training videos, and began exploring how tracking and artificial intelligence could be built directly into the platform. The Resilience app was born out of that period.

    At the same time, the wider world woke up to resilience. It went mainstream. Organisations actively sought it out. Entrepreneurs, scientists, and celebrities rushed in to build businesses doing good while making money, with enormous variability in quality, from overnight charlatans to genuinely credible, deep specialists. Hundreds of start-ups now invest billions building solutions, and the self-improvement app market has expanded into the tens of thousands of individual products. Established consulting firms have rebranded themselves as experts overnight. It’s a genuinely chaotic market, whether you’re a provider, an organisational buyer, or an individual trying to make sense of it all.

    Defining Resilience

    Resilience today sits roughly where logistics sat during World War II: the challenge is integrating a vast number of interacting, moving parts, each guarded by specialists defending their own domain and hoping to dominate the solution. Will it be sports scientists, psychologists, neurobiologists, doctors, coaches, technology companies, or the major consultancies who define the field? The honest answer is probably some combination of all of them, which is exactly the problem.

    The first real challenge is language. “Wellness” means different things to different people, and depression alone can legitimately be addressed through multiple, genuinely different approaches. Are you buying wellness, mental health, wellbeing, emotional intelligence, mental skills, stress mastery, peak performance, or medical services? Making sense of both the need and the right solution requires two axes: level of function, from diagnosed disease through to genuine excellence, and the specific territory being addressed. Testing your own understanding against both axes tends to expose real confusion fast, and providers, purchasers, and researchers would all benefit from more of that clarity up front.

    The second challenge is integrating these concepts into a realistic, evidence-based, practical framework, one that respects each contributing field without letting any single one claim the whole territory. A psychologist might initially believe CBT is the only real answer to depression, and with genuine wisdom and flexibility, come to acknowledge that sleep, fitness, connection, breath training, or medication may work better for a given client. A good diagnostic and development model defines level of function and the realistic options available, since even genuine experts experience mental illness themselves, and people who are genuinely unwell can still benefit meaningfully from non-medical interventions alongside clinical care. Some people naturally understand the world through a physical lens; others through emotion, mind, or a more spiritual frame. There are many legitimate paths to resilience, and a good coach, trainer, or consultant recognises which lens a given client is actually using and adjusts accordingly, rather than insisting on one universal framework.

    Measuring Resilience

    Any assessment can increase self-awareness to some degree, but a genuinely good one has to be evidence-based, integrated across domains, and practical. Most existing tools rest on a single framework, say CBT, address a single level of function, typically depression, and cover only one dimension of resilience, usually mental or emotional. Many psychological assessments were originally built and validated on university student populations, and don’t always translate cleanly to other communities.

    A genuinely good assessment needs to be clear, simple, appropriately short, reliable, and valid, which takes years of psychometric work across different populations, real experimentation with reporting formats, and careful evaluation of whether interventions actually move the needle. The web and mobile apps have transformed the practical ability to run assessments at scale, but people only complete them consistently if the experience itself is genuinely compelling.

    Wearable technology now adds objective measures directly, steps, heart rate, sleep, heart rate variability, even blood pressure, which combined with subjective self-report is pushing assessment tools toward real power: potentially a coherent panel spanning physical measures (heart rate, blood pressure, heart rate variability), emotional measures (heart rate variability, the ratio of positive to negative emotion), and mental measures (focus duration, task-switching, idea generation, situational agility).

    Evidence for Resilience

    Investment decisions tend to come from three distinct places. Some organisations invest because it’s genuinely the right thing to do, they value their people, want to reduce suffering, and want to be recognised as a good employer; their people tend to engage wholeheartedly as a result. Others invest purely on economics, asking specifically what financial return the investment produces; if the numbers don’t clearly show it, they simply aren’t in the market, regardless of what their people might actually need. Others invest out of fear, which is exactly why safety and mental health services can be so lucrative: these organisations are genuinely afraid of risk and being held publicly accountable, so they gravitate toward mitigating risk concentrated in a small number of people while the broader workforce quietly disengages.

    A genuinely good resilience solution addresses all three motivations at once: helping organisations understand and mitigate real risk, improving the function and productivity of their people, and supporting a genuine claim to being a good employer. Demonstrating that value convincingly is difficult, expensive, and time-consuming, requiring an evidence-based, integrated framework, an effective assessment, a comprehensive reporting dashboard, both face-to-face and digital engagement, meaningful goal-setting, and follow-up reassessment over time.

    There is genuinely good evidence that resilience initiatives deliver real results. Many providers still focus narrowly on single-factor gains, health improvement, positivity, optimism, in isolation. Resilience Institute’s own data shows something broader: resilience as a whole improves following training, and every one of the underlying categories and factors measured shows improvement in post-training assessment, not just the single metric a narrower programme might target. A genuinely good assessment can also pinpoint exactly where an individual or organisation’s risks and strengths sit, so training investment can be targeted precisely rather than applied uniformly, which remains one of the biggest open opportunities for organisations that take this seriously.

    The Future of Resilience

    Many of the classic survival-era risks and fitness tests have been engineered out of daily life for most people. Natural selective pressure is, for now, largely held at bay. Much of the physical, emotional, and mental suffering that remains traces back to self-neglect: the pressures of modern life produce a slow-burn distress that human physiology genuinely isn’t well prepared for. The costs, lifestyle disease, loneliness, distress, anxiety, depression, are enormous and continuing to grow. With nature’s usual pressures largely removed, communities, families, and individuals increasingly have to take ownership of resilience directly. Neglecting body, emotion, and mind carries a real personal and community cost; deliberately building these resources produces real, outsized benefit, especially when nature does eventually deliver a shock, fire, flood, earthquake, or otherwise.

    The evidence for taking this seriously is clear, and the cost of continued inaction is increasingly obvious. Enlightened communities and organisations are already acting on it. Assessments will likely continue combining with data analytics and artificial intelligence, offering increasingly precise insight into where risks and opportunities actually sit and how to engage them. Implementation, training, and coaching will likely shift progressively from external consultants toward in-house resources, the same way an elite sports team builds its own extensive support and coaching infrastructure rather than outsourcing it entirely.

    Some people are already fully on board, taking complete ownership of tracking and building their own resilience, actively seeking out genuine experts, building daily disciplines, and experimenting with new tools and devices, and genuinely thriving as a result. The Netflix series Grace and Frankie offers a good, watchable example of this kind of deliberate, later-life reinvention in action. Many more sit right on the threshold; with the right communication and engagement, they could take advantage of resilience just as quickly. Others remain resistant, or simply so overwhelmed by other pressures that self-neglect has become a default way of life. That group will need real kindness paired with wisdom and courage, sometimes a firmer hand and more intensive support to help them genuinely bounce, grow, connect, and find flow. That remains, honestly, the grittiest part of this whole challenge.

    Resilience went from a fringe idea questioned by colleagues and executives alike to a field attracting billions in investment. The next chapter is less about proving it matters and more about building it well.

    Positivity at Work: What Actually Builds a Resilient Culture

    • Nearly 3 in 4 employees report feeling more engaged and performing better when they feel genuinely heard, and companies where employees feel heard financially outperform their industry peers by a meaningful margin.
    • A popular claim that high-performing teams have exactly 6 positive interactions for every negative one doesn’t hold up. The underlying mathematical model was formally withdrawn by the journal that published it after a rigorous critique found the equations had no legitimate connection to emotional data.
    • The more modest, still-defensible version survives: teams and cultures with a healthier balance of positive to negative interaction do tend to perform better, there’s just no precise magic number behind it.

    Positivity at work is more than an individual’s mindset. It’s part of a larger system shaping how a workforce interacts, how people align with organisational goals, and how the culture as a whole either compounds or erodes over time. Leaders set values, expectations, and rules of engagement that flow down through an organisation; employees hold their own attitudes and perceptions that flow back up and shape culture in return. Building a genuinely positive workplace culture requires understanding both directions of that exchange, not just the one leadership controls.

    Why Culture Shows Up in the Numbers, Not Just the Vibe

    Do you feel listened to, supported, and included at work, or unheard and boxed in? That distinction matters for more than morale. A report on workplace mental health and wellbeing from the US Surgeon General found workplace culture has a substantial, measurable impact on employee wellbeing, productivity, and organisational performance. Toxic or negative cultures reliably show up in lost productivity and declining quality of work; positive cultures show up in stronger engagement and innovation. Culture has become a genuine input to the bottom line, not a soft adjacent concern.

    Employer priorities have shifted meaningfully in recent years, driven by a genuine rebalancing of what employees expect from work. Ernst & Young research found 54% of US workers had left a job specifically due to their manager’s lack of empathy toward workplace issues, and 49% left because of inadequate sensitivity to stress from their home life. The organisations that adapted fastest to this shift are now measurably ahead on culture-related metrics; the ones that didn’t are the ones still asking why retention feels harder than it used to.

    When Positivity Tips Into Something Toxic

    Genuine positivity means holding a constructive outlook while still engaging honestly with the good, the bad, and everything in between. Taken to an extreme, it curdles into something else. Tabitha Kirkland, a psychologist at the University of Washington, describes toxic positivity as an approach devoid of empathy that refuses to acknowledge genuine difficulty. It leaves people feeling invalidated and unheard, which is directly corrosive to the same engagement and performance positivity is supposed to build in the first place.

    A Workforce Institute survey found nearly three in four employees feel more engaged and perform better when they feel genuinely heard, and companies that financially outperform their industry peers show employees reporting feeling heard at a 26-percentage-point higher rate than their less successful counterparts. Taking positivity to a forced, unconditional extreme reliably backfires against the very outcomes it’s meant to produce.

    What Positive Leadership Actually Looks Like

    Positive leadership plays to people’s genuine strengths, gives real recognition, and maintains an authentically optimistic outlook, and it’s been consistently correlated with better engagement, optimism, and performance across the research.

    Play to strengths, not roundedness. Management thinker Peter Drucker argued individuals create more impact by deliberately sharpening the skills they already excel at rather than chasing a well-rounded profile. Leaders can apply this at the team level too: pairing a strong analyst with a strong presenter on a single project often produces something neither could deliver alone.

    Recognition compounds. Gallup’s research has found employees who don’t feel recognised at work are roughly twice as likely to leave. Recognition also does more than retain people individually; it signals clearly across a team what leadership actually values, which shapes behaviour well beyond the person being recognised. When feedback needs to address something that isn’t working, framing the conversation around what’s going well and how to build forward tends to land far better than leading with criticism.

    The ratio claim worth retiring. A once-popular claim held that high-performing teams show exactly six positive interactions for every negative one, while low-performing teams show one positive for every twenty negative. This traces back to research on team dynamics closely tied to the Fredrickson-Losada “critical positivity ratio,” a specific mathematical model that the journal American Psychologist formally, partially withdrew in 2013 after a rigorous critique found the underlying equations, borrowed from fluid dynamics, had no legitimate mathematical connection to emotional or team data. The researcher who built the model chose not to defend it. What survives is a softer, still-defensible point: teams with a healthier balance of constructive to critical interaction do tend to perform better. There’s just no precise number behind it, and it’s worth being skeptical of anyone citing one with false confidence.

    Optimism Spreads Through a Team, Literally

    The American Psychological Association defines optimism as the attitude that good things will happen and that one’s aims will ultimately be fulfilled. Optimistic leaders contribute something genuinely functional to a team beyond mood: they help generate solutions, build a credible vision forward, and reinforce the behaviours that move a team toward it.

    Wharton professor Sigal Barsade’s research on emotional contagion, the documented ripple effect through which emotions spread across individuals and groups, found positive emotional contagion specifically helps teams collaborate better, reduces conflict, and improves performance. When optimism becomes genuinely embedded in a team’s culture rather than performed, individuals within it tend to develop their own personal sense of optimism, which industry research from Leadership IQ, surveying over 11,000 employees, found may matter even more than manager-driven recognition alone: employees with a strong personal sense of optimism were more than twice as likely to report feeling inspired to do their best work.

    Resilience: The Skill Underneath the Culture

    The American Psychological Association defines resilience as the flexibility to adapt to change and challenge, and critically, it’s a trainable skill rather than a fixed trait. That same Leadership IQ research found resilience accounts for a meaningful share of an employee’s overall sense of inspiration at work, independent of recognition or optimism alone.

    Resilience Institute has tracked resilience levels across organisations globally for years, using a Resilience Diagnostic assessment built on 60 psychometric questions that measure the specific factors supporting or undermining resilience, producing what’s known as a Resilience Ratio for individuals and organisations alike.

    The Resilience Spiral

    This visual framework organises the 60 questions into 11 categories arranged as a spiral, giving each user a map of strengths, risks, and practical next steps. The upper half of the spiral, Spirit in Action, Train Mind, Engage Emotion, Energise Body, and Master Stress, represents the direction of genuine growth, connection, and flow. Spirit in Action, at the top, represents peak performance. Master Stress sits at the base, the pivot point: left unmanaged, stress is what determines whether someone moves up the spiral or down it.

    The lower half, Confused, Disengaged, Withdrawn, Vulnerable, Distressed, and Depressed, represents the progression when resilience isn’t sustained. Confusion produces a loss of focus; disengagement leads to boredom and falling productivity; withdrawal costs energy and presence; vulnerability shows up as fatigue and indifference; distress drives attrition and a deteriorating culture. Individuals and organisations operating from the upper half consistently function at a higher level than those sliding into the lower one.

    Training It, Not Just Measuring It

    Resilience Institute’s own training data, spanning the Resilience app, webinars, workshops, and communications support, has found structured resilience training measurably increases performance, reduces risk, and boosts growth in capability. The app itself provides ongoing access to resilience content, goal tracking, meditations, video training from Dr Sven Hansen, and a support chatbot, alongside the diagnostic that anchors the whole system. Thousands of organisations globally use this combination to measure and actively build both individual and organisational resilience, and the same balance-of-interaction principle discussed above, genuine, not forced, positivity, is exactly what the training is designed to build.

    Positive culture isn’t a mood you generate once and coast on. It’s a ratio you keep genuinely honest, with no magic number required, just the discipline to keep it real.

    Peace, Love, and Joy: The Practices Behind the Words

    • Peace, love, and joy aren’t just pleasant abstractions. Each has a real physiological signature, and each can be deliberately cultivated through specific, practised techniques.
    • Psychologist Barbara Fredrickson’s broaden-and-build research found positive emotions aren’t just pleasant to feel, they measurably expand attention, build lasting psychological resources, and compound over time when practised consistently.
    • These practices complement, rather than replace, appropriate clinical support. Anxiety, prolonged anger, and depression are genuine conditions that sometimes need therapy or medication alongside anything self-directed.

    Humans are a forceful species. In a short span of evolutionary time, we’ve reshaped the physical world around us, capable of remarkable brilliance and generosity, and just as capable of destruction. Underneath most of what drives that behaviour sits something simpler: nearly everyone is reaching for more peace, more love, and more joy, whatever form that reaching takes.

    Leadership, at its best, moves people toward more of these three states, in a family, a team, or a country. When that direction is lost, real suffering tends to follow. Disruption is inevitable in any life, and under real threat, peace can shatter into fear, love can curdle into anger, and joy can sink into sadness. None of those three feel good, each in its own distinct way, and the discomfort is what drives the search to recover the state underneath it.

    Left unaddressed, fear can deepen into anxiety, anger into chronic hostility, and sadness into depression, genuine conditions that often benefit from real clinical support, therapy and medication among them, not just self-directed practice. What follows isn’t a substitute for that support. It’s a set of specific, practical techniques for cultivating peace, love, and joy directly, worth genuine, sustained engagement whether or not clinical support is also part of the picture.

    Peace

    Peace is a state of calm and felt safety, closely tied to activity in the vagus nerve, the body’s primary channel for shifting out of threat-response mode and into genuine rest. It’s the physiological foundation everything else in this piece builds on. While leaders, parents, organisations, and governments all have a real role in creating environments that feel safe, the actual experience of peace inside any given moment remains an individual, trainable capacity.

    When external safety measures aren’t enough, and fear takes over anyway, the path back to peace runs through the body first. Slow, diaphragmatic breathing, muscle relaxation, and a softened gaze all measurably shift the nervous system out of sympathetic activation. Consistent practice makes the return faster and more reliable over time, and being able to generate genuine calm on demand, even inside a real threat, is what allows someone to act with skill instead of reactivity.

    1

    Cultivating Peace

    Exhale and consciously release tension in the face and body. Slow the breath and notice heart rate following it down. Soften the eyes and let attention widen, toward nature if it’s available. Deliberately radiate a sense of calm and steadiness. Bring attention fully into the present moment, and let yourself genuinely register the feeling of peacefulness once it arrives, rather than rushing past it.

    Love

    Love, in this context, means a state of genuine positive connection, the foundation underneath real collaboration and shared success. Psychologist Barbara Fredrickson’s broaden-and-build theory, one of positive psychology’s more empirically robust contributions, found that positive emotions like love and connection don’t just feel good in the moment. They measurably broaden attention and creativity, and build lasting psychological, social, and even physical resources over time. A randomised trial Fredrickson ran on loving-kindness meditation found participants who practised it regularly showed genuine, compounding increases in positive emotion and life satisfaction over weeks, not just an immediate mood bump.

    When connection collapses into anger instead, the physiological cost is real: chronic anger is associated with elevated inflammation and cardiovascular strain, and it tends to drive blame and rupture rather than repair. Love, by contrast, is active and demanding in its own way. It requires genuinely respecting others, staying open to perspectives that differ from your own, and remaining capable of care even when someone has caused real hurt.

    2

    Cultivating Love

    Start from the peace practice above; love builds on that same settled base. Lengthen the spine and open the shoulders and hands. Direct genuine warmth and patience toward yourself first. Actively appreciate whatever is present in your immediate awareness. Deliberately extend a feeling of goodwill outward, to people you know, to people you don’t, to the wider world. This is the same core mechanism behind loving-kindness meditation, and the research suggests it compounds with regular practice rather than staying flat.

    Joy

    Joy is a state of genuine exuberance, energising and motivating, and it tends to draw other people toward it rather than requiring effort to project. Fredrickson’s broaden-and-build research found joy specifically supports flow, the state of fully absorbed, high-performance engagement, and helps orient people back toward what actually matters to them.

    When joy gives way to sustained sadness instead, energy tends to collapse and withdrawal follows, a genuine and difficult experience, and one that, when it persists or deepens, is worth taking seriously as a signal to seek real support rather than something to simply will your way out of. Cultivating joy, like the other two states, takes deliberate, repeated effort. It rarely arrives simply by waiting for good news.

    3

    Cultivating Joy

    Build on the peace and love practices above; joy sits on top of both. Let a genuine smile reach the corners of the eyes, not just the mouth. Let that sense of ease spread through the whole body, not just the face. Focus attention fully on whatever’s genuinely good in view right now, however small. Let yourself register that this specific moment is enough as it is. Share the feeling visibly with whoever’s around, and let yourself actually savour it rather than moving straight past it to the next thing.

    Peace, love, and joy aren’t states you wait for. They’re states you practise, the same way any other skill compounds with genuine, repeated attention.

    How to Build And Practise Optimism

    • In RI’s own sample of 21,000 professionals, 95% of the most resilient 10% scored themselves as thinking and communicating with optimism “very often” or “nearly always.” Only 9% of the least resilient group scored the same way.
    • Psychologist Martin Seligman’s decades of research on “learned optimism” found the real skill isn’t feeling upbeat, it’s a specific, trainable explanatory style: how you explain setbacks to yourself.
    • A popular rule of thumb, aiming for three positive observations for every complaint, doesn’t hold up. The mathematical model behind it was formally withdrawn by the journal that published it.

    Neuropsychologist Rick Hanson describes the human mind as Velcro for negative experiences and Teflon for positive ones, and there’s a real evolutionary logic behind it. In a genuinely high-threat environment, a quick, negative, threat-focused explanation kept our ancestors alive. In most of modern life, that same reflex mostly just gets in the way. Pessimism doesn’t protect you from much anymore. It just disables you.

    What RI’s Own Data Shows

    Across a sample of 21,000 professionals, 95% of the most resilient 10% rated the statement “I think and communicate with optimism” as true “very often” or “nearly always.” Among the least resilient group, only 9% scored the same way. This isn’t a small correlation. It’s one of the more consistent splits across everything RI’s own data tracks.

    Optimism Is a Skill, Not a Personality

    Psychologist Martin Seligman’s decades of research on what he termed “learned optimism” reframed the whole idea. The core skill isn’t feeling naturally cheerful. It’s explanatory style, the specific, largely automatic way you explain setbacks to yourself in the moment they happen. Seligman’s research identified three dimensions that separate an optimistic explanatory style from a pessimistic one: whether a setback is explained as permanent or temporary, as pervasive across everything or specific to this one situation, and as entirely personal or shaped by circumstances outside you. People with a pessimistic style tend to explain bad events as permanent, pervasive, and entirely their fault, “this always happens to me,” “I ruin everything,” while people with an optimistic style treat the same setback as temporary, specific, and only partly within their control.

    This distinction matters because explanatory style is measurably learnable. It isn’t fixed at birth, and CBT-based interventions targeting exactly this pattern have real, consistent evidence behind them as an effective approach to depression and anxiety.

    A Popular Rule Worth Retiring

    A frequently repeated piece of advice suggests aiming for at least three positive observations for every complaint. It’s worth knowing where that number actually comes from: a specific mathematical model, popularised in Barbara Fredrickson’s research and her bestselling book on the “3 to 1 ratio,” that the journal American Psychologist formally, partially withdrew in 2013. A rigorous critique found the underlying equations were borrowed from fluid dynamics and had no legitimate mathematical connection to emotional data. The researcher who built the original model declined to defend it.

    What survives, and what Fredrickson herself continued to defend even after conceding the maths was wrong, is the softer, more honest version: noticing and voicing genuine positive observations alongside legitimate complaints is a healthy habit worth building. There’s just no precise ratio behind it, and chasing an exact number risks turning a useful practice into a performance.

    Building Optimism: What to Do Right Now

    1

    Ask Someone Who Knows You

    Ask someone close whether they’d describe you as more optimistic or more pessimistic, and ask for a specific example. Explanatory style is often more visible to the people around you than to yourself.

    2

    Notice the Actual Words

    Watch the specific language you use to make sense of a setback. “This always happens to me” is the permanent, pervasive, personal pattern Seligman’s research flags directly. Just noticing the phrase as it happens is the first real step.

    3

    Reframe Toward Responsibility

    Try replacing the blame-framed version with “what could I do differently?” That single shift moves the explanation from a fixed, personal failing toward something specific and within your control, exactly the shift that defines an optimistic explanatory style.

    4

    Stay Genuinely Alert for Good News

    Make a habit of actively noticing and voicing positive observations alongside legitimate complaints. There’s no magic ratio to hit, just a real, worthwhile habit of not letting the negative crowd out everything else by default.

    The Foundations Running in the Background

    Fatigue, isolation, and ongoing distress all measurably erode optimism, which is worth knowing before assuming a pessimistic stretch is purely a mindset problem. Protecting sleep, staying genuinely social, making time to relax and play, and deliberately nurturing positive emotions, joy, gratitude, appreciation, hope, and kindness, all support the same explanatory-style shift the practices above are aiming for. Optimism doesn’t run on willpower alone; it runs on the same foundational rhythm everything else in resilience depends on.

    Periods of genuine uncertainty, economic, social, or otherwise, tend to make optimism both harder to sustain and more valuable when it holds. The skill doesn’t get easier to build during hard stretches. It just becomes more worth having.

    Optimism isn’t a mood you either have or don’t. It’s the sentence you choose when explaining what just went wrong, and that sentence is trainable.

    Digital Technology and Resilience: What Actually Helps and What Actually Harms

    • A 2025 study of more than 35,000 people found deactivating Facebook or Instagram for six weeks produced a measurable, if modest, improvement in wellbeing, comparable to roughly 15 to 22% of the effect of a structured psychological intervention like CBT.
    • The harm isn’t the technology itself. It’s largely about design choices built to maximise engagement, and the dose and context in which people use it.
    • The same category of technology that can erode resilience, when engagement-optimised and unbounded, can also build it, when it’s collaboration tools, sleep tracking, or structured mindfulness practice used deliberately.

    Organisms adapt to their environment over millennia to improve their odds of survival and reproduction. Humans mastered fire and complex language, gaining an edge over apex predators and the elements. We’re a species defined by relentless invention, and that impulse hasn’t slowed down. We’ve gone from tribal groups of roughly 150 people to a global network carried in a pocket. It’s worth asking honestly: is that shift outpacing what we’ve had time to adapt to?

    What Resilience Actually Means Here

    Amit Sood, executive director of the Global Centre for Resiliency and Well-Being, defines resilience as the ability to withstand adversity and bounce back and grow despite life’s downturns. Resilience Institute takes largely the same view: high resilience is the capacity for growth, mental, emotional, and physical, amid and beyond adversity, not just surviving it intact. Some call the more advanced version of this antifragility: genuinely relishing chaos rather than merely tolerating it.

    The New Atmosphere We’re All Living In

    Weather has shaped human behaviour for eons, which is exactly why it’s still the default conversation opener. “Lovely day out there?” is really a way of reading someone’s mood and establishing basic trust. There’s now a second atmosphere surrounding each of us, shaped by algorithms that understand our attention and emotional triggers better than we consciously do. A full inbox or a stream of notifications functions like weather: some of it moves us toward useful action, and some of it brings nothing but overwhelm and distraction.

    The Real, Documented Risks

    Digital technology’s benefits are genuinely indisputable. It’s also not without real costs, and several of them are well documented rather than speculative.

    Social isolation. Social platforms were meant to bring people closer together. Research has found the opposite can also be true: heavier social media use is associated with less in-person socialising and correlates with higher anxiety in large longitudinal samples. Separately, research on device presence has found that simply having a phone visible during a conversation, even switched off, measurably reduces people’s sense of emotional connection with each other. The device doesn’t need to be in use to interfere.

    Attention and compulsive checking. A meaningful share of adults report real anxiety after just a short period without checking social platforms, and a smaller but notable share admit checking in situations most people would agree are unsafe, while driving, for instance. This pattern reflects deliberate design, not user weakness; platforms compete directly for attention, and engagement-optimised feeds are built to make disengaging difficult.

    Cyberbullying. Young people who experience cyberbullying show a significantly elevated risk of suicidal ideation compared to peers who don’t, and researchers note this form of bullying can carry an added weight: it plays out in front of a far larger, more persistent audience than traditional bullying ever did.

    Harmful content moderation. Content promoting self-harm remains a genuine, ongoing challenge for platform moderation, particularly for younger users. Platforms have made real investments in detecting and removing this content, but enforcement is inconsistent, and harmful material can persist under alternate framing even after direct terms are blocked. This is a serious, unresolved problem, worth taking seriously as a parent or an organisation supporting young people, without needing to catalogue the specific ways it currently evades detection.

    Misinformation. Misinformation spread at real scale during the COVID-19 pandemic, and popular misinformation sources at points generated more views than major public health institutions. This remains a live, ongoing challenge rather than a resolved one; platforms have taken varying and evolving approaches to moderation and labelling, with real debate, from multiple legitimate perspectives, about where the line between harmful misinformation and legitimate dissent should sit. That’s a genuinely contested policy question, not one with a single settled answer.

    What the Best Current Research Actually Shows

    The strongest recent evidence on this comes from a 2025 study published through the National Bureau of Economic Research, run by Hunt Allcott, Matthew Gentzkow, and a large team of independent academics in partnership with Meta, with the academic authors retaining full control over the analysis and findings. Involving more than 35,000 participants, nearly 20,000 deactivating Facebook and over 15,500 deactivating Instagram, it found that six weeks of deactivation produced a measurable improvement in an index of happiness, depression, and anxiety. The effect was real but modest, roughly 15 to 22% as large as the effect of a structured psychological intervention like cognitive behavioural therapy. The Facebook effect was concentrated among users over 35; the Instagram effect was concentrated among women under 25. Deactivation also reduced participants’ knowledge of current events, a genuine trade-off worth naming honestly rather than glossing over.

    The honest takeaway from research at this scale isn’t “delete everything” or “it’s all fine.” It’s that the effect is real, directionally consistent with smaller earlier studies, and meaningful without being dramatic, exactly the kind of nuanced finding that gets lost in more dichotomous popular framing of the issue.

    Where Digital Technology Genuinely Builds Resilience

    The same broad category of technology that can erode resilience when engagement-optimised and unbounded can also build it when used deliberately.

    Collaboration tools. Knowledge workers spend a substantial share of a typical week on email and searching for information, time that real-time collaboration tools can meaningfully reduce by cutting down the back-and-forth of collecting feedback and comments separately from each contributor.

    Mindfulness and meditation apps. Because this category is relatively young, large long-term studies are still catching up to adoption, but the research available so far is consistent: users report measurable stress reduction that can persist for up to two weeks after a session, and some show physiological markers of reduced stress even when they don’t consciously report feeling calmer. Reported secondary benefits include better focus, improved mood, reduced fatigue, and greater self-acceptance.

    Health and fitness tracking. Apps that track diet, movement, or vitals make it straightforward to monitor progress and notice patterns worth adjusting. The tool itself won’t supply motivation, that still has to come from the person using it, but tracking consistently correlates with better sleep, more consistent exercise, and improved dietary awareness simply by making patterns visible in real time.

    Sleep, the exception worth flagging. Devices used near bedtime are a clear, well-documented exception to “technology can help.” A controlled study comparing e-reader use to print reading before bed found e-reader users experienced delayed melatonin release, slept worse, and felt less rested the following day. The pull to check a device “just quickly” reliably extends into longer use and makes falling asleep harder. This is one place where the evidence points in a single, unambiguous direction: keep devices out of the bedroom, or at minimum off in the hour before sleep.

    Technology doesn’t have a fixed effect on resilience. It has a dose, a design, and a context, and all three matter more than whether the technology exists at all.

    Vitality Is a Super Skill: What the Research Shows

    • In RI’s own sample of 21,000 professionals, the statement “I enjoy vibrant, good health and high energy” reliably separates the most resilient 10% from everyone else. Only 9% of the least resilient group scores it favourably.
    • Vitality has a real academic home: self-determination theory defines it as the felt sense of energy available to the self, and it’s been actively studied and re-validated as recently as 2025.
    • A key nuance the fitness-and-sleep framing misses: research finds people can feel genuinely vital even after real physical exertion, provided the activity was autonomously chosen rather than imposed.

    Some people walk into a demanding week and seem to generate energy as they go. Others start depleted and stay that way regardless of how much sleep they logged the night before. The difference isn’t just biology. It’s a specific, well-studied psychological state researchers call vitality, and it turns out to be considerably more than the sum of good sleep and regular exercise.

    What RI’s Own Data Shows

    Across a sample of 21,000 professionals, one statement reliably separates the most resilient 10% from everyone else: “I enjoy vibrant, good health and high energy.” Among the least resilient group, only 9% rate that statement as true “very often” or “nearly always.” Vitality functions as both an output and an input here. People who wait passively for it to arrive via doctors, public services, or luck tend to suffer. People who actively invest in the foundations, or simply decide to be vital, tend not to.

    Vitality Has a Real Research Home

    Vitality isn’t just a motivational phrase. Psychologists Richard Ryan and Christina Frederick formally defined subjective vitality within self-determination theory as the felt sense of energy available to the self, feeling alive, alert, and enthusiastic rather than simply not-tired. It’s been an active area of study ever since, and 2025 alone saw new validation research applying a refined Subjective Vitality/Depletion Scale across both older adults and adolescents, confirming the construct holds up as a distinct, measurable state across very different life stages.

    Self-determination theory frames vitality as arising largely from the satisfaction of three basic psychological needs: autonomy, the sense of acting from genuine choice; competence, the sense of being effective; and relatedness, genuine connection to others. When those needs are met, vitality tends to follow. When they’re chronically frustrated, depletion does, regardless of how many hours were spent asleep the night before.

    The Nuance Most Advice Misses

    Here’s the part worth sitting with. A 2025 review of self-determination theory research on physical activity found that people can experience genuine vitality even after significant physical effort, provided the activity was willingly embraced rather than imposed. The same workout, the same hours, the same physical output can leave one person energised and another person drained, depending largely on whether it felt chosen.

    This reframes the usual advice. “Be fit, sleep well, eat well” is necessary but incomplete. A rigid, externally imposed fitness regime someone resents can cost vitality even while technically improving fitness markers. The research points to something more specific: build the foundations, but build them in a way that feels genuinely yours, not merely compliant.

    Building Vitality: What to Do Right Now

    1

    Decide, Don’t Just Endure

    Resist fatigue and apathy actively rather than passively absorbing them. Commit to the pursuit of vitality as a deliberate choice, not a hope that it shows up on its own.

    2

    Open Your Posture and Exhale Fully

    Lengthen through the spine, head back, chin level. A closed, collapsed posture reinforces low energy; an open one gives the body somewhere to put it.

    3

    Breathe With Intent

    As you inhale, imagine energy moving up through the body in a spiral. It sounds simple because it is; the physical act of a full, deliberate breath genuinely shifts physiological state.

    4

    Let It Show on Your Face

    Let your eyes carry the crinkle of a genuine smile. Facial expression and felt state run in both directions; this isn’t performance, it’s part of the actual mechanism.

    The Foundations Running in the Background

    Alongside the moment-to-moment practices above, vitality rests on habits that need to run continuously rather than being invoked once: protecting real sleep, building genuine all-round fitness, making time to relax, breathe, or meditate, and staying playful enough to keep extending your own creativity. None of these work as a one-time fix. They’re the ongoing infrastructure vitality is built on, and per the autonomy research above, they hold up best when they feel like your own choices rather than an externally imposed regime.

    Vitality isn’t just what’s left over after enough sleep and exercise. It’s what happens when effort feels genuinely yours, not merely correct.

    What is Spirit in Action in Resilience Spiral Part 3

    Life is a storm. You will bask in the sunlight one moment, be shattered on the rocks the next. What makes you human is what you do when that storm comes. – Alexandre Dumas, The Count of Monte Cristo.

    Part 1 explored what Spirit in Action is and Part 2 scoped out why this is important at individual, community and planetary levels of function. In Part 3 the question to address is: “What exactly should, could or will I do?”

    This is the most difficult challenge to engage with. Our personal responsibility is contentious. Some strive for decades in abject poverty, accumulating tens of thousands of hours in prayer or meditation. Others simply relax into the moment. You might choose to punish the body, discipline the emotions or train the mind. Or, you may choose bacchanalian revelry.

    For many today, drifting about in mindless fidgeting, distraction and impulse gratification becomes the default. As we see in burgeoning reports the impact is clearly evident:

    • We spend 10 hours in front of a screen versus 17 minutes active (National Geographic, 2017)
    • The average person will touch, swipe or tap a phone 2,617 times a day (Lewis P, 2017)
    • Our fitness, strength and posture are in decline (Journal of Physical Therapy, 2016)
    • Over 70% take medication and 2% take over 5 medications (Mayo Clinic, 2015)
    • Adults sleep an hour less than needed – teens 2 hours less (Walker M, 2018)
    • We are self-centred and lonely – teen togetherness dropped 40% 2010-15 (Twenge J, 2017)
    • Anxiety (and worry) is a constant companion
    • Depression and suicide continue to increase
    • We have pushed our planet into the 6th great extinction (McKibben B, 2019)

    Gyms, diet books, mindfulness, mental health professionals, medicine as a whole and medication have little impact beyond a lucky few. We desperately need a fresh approach.

    The question “what should, could or will I do?” becomes interesting. With unlimited freedom to choose combined with the irresistible compulsion to react to short term gratification, most of us have surrendered the quest for higher levels of consciousness.

    Many religions have been used on a “should” basis. Authorities decree that people should follow the rules of the church. If we look at the state of many lives, perhaps the approach has merit in our modern world.

    What we “could” do is extraordinary. Imagine if we applied modern wisdom, technology and medicine with respect and resolve to human life. This is incredibly exciting. We are clearly capable of immense greatness – peace, vitality, love, clarity and flow. We watch this achievement amongst our athletes, musicians, artists, entrepreneurs and philanthropists.

    This vision of actualised human beings has guided the great work of William James, Abraham Maslow, Mihalyi Csikszentmihalyi, Ken Wilber and those at the Mind & Life Institute. It is a vision of optimism and hope. In the face of the many challenges facing humanity, it is essential to remember and drill this possibility.

    Spirit in Action is a method to frame and guide this journey. If willing and able, here are five deliberate practices that will take you to a much better place.

    First, strive to be calm, steady and still in the storms of life. Caught up in the adrenaline surge of fight or flight, we sink to a reptilian level of consciousness. When calm you are healing, moving, feeling and thinking better.

    Drill: learn and master contemplative/breathing/relaxing practice 5 min per day

    Second, strive to be healthy, energised and dynamic. Illness, fatigue or lethargy makes the experience of enlightenment impossible to sustain. Being able to enjoy vitality is a key part of the experience of connection and joy.

    Drill: be non-negotiable in your sleep, activity and nutritional disciplines

    Third, strive to be positive, empathic and caring. It is essential to consciously feel and flex your emotions with an orientation towards generosity. The experience of peace, love and joy is diagnostic of enlightenment for many theologians.

    Drill: restrain your impulses, generate joy and respect the joy of others

    Fourth, strive to be present, focused and clear. Ruminating on the past or fretting about the future causes suffering. When present, we experience each moment in its fullness. Suffering drops away.

    Drill: catch your thinking and focus 100% on the present moment

    Fifth, live with skill and purpose – particularly in the testing moments. Flow is the state of full engagement with a meaningful challenge. Whether this is in loving prayer, skilled acts of compassion or creative pursuit, your spirit (little self) is in action and you will feel one with Spirit (greater reality).

    Drill: define how, where and why you get flow and get a little every day

    Accepting wise mentorship on this path of deliberate practice will accelerate your quest. It is very easy to get stuck in eddies when one area consumes too much attention. Many who exercise fanatically clean forget to relax or develop their emotions. Many meditate at the expense of their physical capabilities. Sometimes too much love, can distort our altruism into destructive sympathy.

    Our development framework for Spirit in Action

    Each of these base categories of discipline can reach levels of enlightenment. Consider the advanced yogi (super-calm), your favourite athlete (grace), Buddhist compassion (love), mathematical brilliance (clarity). They all trend towards flow.

    There are many paths available for enlightenment. We live in a wonderfully diverse and creative world because humans courageously pioneer untrodden paths. Use the basic concepts and the lessons of our great spiritual traditions to stabilise and direct your journey. Seek truth, respect and practicality.

    At the end of the day you have to choose and walk your own path.

    As Gandhi reminds us:

    To remake the world, you have to remake yourself.

    Original Source: https://resiliencei.com/blog/spirit-in-action-part-3/

    What is Spirit in Action in Resilience Spiral Part 2

    What might a contemporary wisdom embrace? Can we seek to better express a shared narrative that seeks truth and goodness? How do we make this wisdom fit for purpose in 2020?

    Part 1 explored spirit from two perspectives. First, the outer journey of connecting to a greater reality (Spirit). Second, the inner journey of integrating our physical, emotional and mental resources to nurture our essence (spirit). Both are basic freedoms for which we are each responsible.

    We recognise and acknowledge different spiritual narratives – or religions. Many (see Aldous Huxley’s Perennial Philosophy) believe that they share a core wisdom. The core wisdom seeks truth and goodness. Humans, as story-tellers, are free to express the stories that help us make sense of, and apply, wisdom.

    Purpose and Direction

    More people die from suicide (800,000 per year) than are killed by human violence (21 Lessons for the 21st Century, Noah Y. Harari, 2018). While fulfilment of basic needs has improved, human wellbeing is in decline. Suffering – particularly in terms of anxiety and depression – is overwhelming. Despair is widespread.

    The core purpose of spiritual wisdom is to reduce suffering. As we reduce suffering, we experience more joy. This is the direction of spirit in action. It is simple and clear.

    1. Understand and reduce suffering.
    2. Seek to build wellbeing and joy.

    The fuel for this journey is hope. Modern wisdom must deliver a message of hope to people. That hope must be built on a good narrative and practical steps one can take to reduce suffering and increase joy. Each person must learn from an early age how to take responsibility for their physical, emotional and mental wellbeing. The must believe in growth for it is here that hope lies.

    Subjectivity and Inclusiveness

    Usage of “I” has trumped “we” in recent decades. Does spiritual wisdom serve the individual or all life? We express a wide range of subjectivity. Some risk health and life to boost muscle mass for a fleeting sense of pride. Others seek a drug or alcohol fix to serve an impulse of joy. Many fiercely serve and defend their tribe, race or nation as we see in modern populism. We may even seek to serve all sentient beings and the resilience of the planet.

    This is a wicked challenge. It may be the most crucial responsibility of wisdom. While humans are easily seduced into selfish impulse, we are equipped with empathy and altruism. We spontaneously seek to reduce suffering. We can care so much for a child, money or a cause that we can neglect ourselves and others who need us. Unrestrained sympathy can cause more suffering.

    Religious conquests with noble objectives to serve ‘god’ and secure a place in heaven, destroyed communities and their cultural achievements. Today we serve money with a devotion that has squandered the beauty of our planet and put all forms of life at extreme risk. Many put their own life and wellbeing at risk on a daily basis to earn an extra dollar.

    At the end of the day, the dilemma is what to love? Myself now, my place in heaven, my children, my tribe, money, humanity, the rhinos or pangolins, all life, natural beauty, truth…? One can understand the frustration of rural leaders when billionaire naturalists want to protect animals by taking land, food and hunting rights from their people. Conservation is a war zone driven by love. What irony.

    Personal Enlightenment

    When resilience fails our behaviour becomes increasingly deluded, short sighted and destructive. We suffer, those around us suffer and hope for a better world is extinguished. The foundation of spiritual wisdom is to support and nurture this inner journey.

    The higher we rise the more important it becomes to reinforce this inner discipline. When leaders lie, steal, self-aggrandise and abuse, the community and natural environs suffer. We see this in corrupt nations, churches, NGOs and businesses.

    Maybe spiritual wisdom is to serve personal enlightenment only. Ultimately, working on both the inner journey of integrating self and connecting to a higher reality is the only show in town. This is the choice of the contemplative in a cave or monastery. Everything else is secular – cultural, political or scientific.

    The commandments might be:

    1. Respect, discipline and love yourself
    2. Respect, acknowledge and be kind to others
    3. Take care of your body
    4. Regulate your emotions
    5. Use your mind to see the truth
    6. Act with wisdom and compassion

    The Social Contract

    We are social creatures. Our individual wellbeing is intimately connected to our community resilience. When we jointly debate and resolve how best to move away from suffering and towards joy, we become an enlightened and just society. The community is a powerful catalyst and support of the personal, inner journey.

    A spiritual wisdom can be the mission and values that bond individual and community into a just, compassionate and creative force. When leaders and community hold each other to account, good will prevail. The different perspectives of a community increase the probability of truth and goodness.

    When spiritual wisdom is absent, we have corrupt communities (or failed states). Self-interest, greed, corruption and mass suffering follows. Evil prevails. It is extremely difficult for personal enlightenment to proceed.

    The extensive suffering and destruction to people, economies, environment and all fellow species is a catastrophic tragedy that takes generations to repair. Our ‘western’ attempts to intervene have failed miserably. This becomes a challenge to the next level.

    Planetary Wisdom

    We live in the age of the Anthropocene when human activity is the major shaping force on the planet. What we do over the next decades will shape the future of life. For 30 years we have known clearly the threat to human life and ecosystems. Yet, we continue to play a game of blind Russian roulette with nuclear arms, carbon emissions, population growth, and waste.

    Neither the individual nor the community – not even a group of nation states – can solve this particular problem. Governance has evolved from tribe, to region, to nation and now wrestles with integrated regions such as the European Community. The pressing challenge is wise and just governance for all humans and the ecosystems we rely upon.

    Our actions or non-actions have profound implications. How much plastic waste is enough? Do we leave failed states to the pillage of their leaders or do we intervene? Do we close coal plants and face economic decline when a coastal population is threatened? Do we leave Africa to double its population knowing full well that many species, habitats and entire ecosystems collapse?  At what point do we obliterate a rogue state threatening nuclear attacks?

    It is possible to construct a spiritual wisdom that might guide the decisions of global bodies such as the UN or WHO? We are facing questions of what is sacred and what is not. Religions have long restrained our impulses and excesses. It feels like a time when a new wisdom might be needed to restrain our consumptive hedonism so that there is something beyond suffering and despair left for our children’s children.

    The call for a spiritual wisdom for humanity is loud. It may go by many names. The principles or commandments might be:

    1. Seek and communicate the truth
    2. Live with restraint and compassion
    3. Respect and steward our planetary ecosystems
    4. Act with courage and creativity
    5. Keep a sense of humour and radiate joy

    We will need enlightened individuals and resilient communities to help us debate, construct, guide and maintain it. The alternative is dark.

    Part 3 addresses the personal practice of spirit in action.

    Original Source: https://resiliencei.com/blog/spirit-in-action-part-2/